Naked Good Little Chipolatas vs Chatar 280 g
Overall, Naked Good Little Chipolatas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Naked Good Little Chipolatas | Chatar 280 g |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 257 kcal | 240 kcal |
| Fat | 18.9 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 7 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 6.3 g | — |
| Protein | 13.6 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 1 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chatar 280 g has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Naked Good Little Chipolatas has 60% less salt (1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Naked Good Little Chipolatas has 19% more protein (13.6 g vs 11 g).
- Naked Good Little Chipolatas has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chatar 280 g lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Naked Good Little Chipolatas
British or Irish Pork (80%), Water, Chicory Fibre (6%), Rice Flour, Flavourings, Chickpea Flour, Potato Fibre, Sea Salt, Spices, Cornflour, Antioxidant: Ascorbic Acid; Dextrose. Filled into vegetable-based casings.
Chatar 280 g
Chicken mechanically removed meat, WHEAT flour, potato stárch, salt, Soy starch, stabilizer. E450, E451, herbs and spices, flavour, glucose, E301, E331, preservative: E325, E262, E250, coloring agent
FAQ
Which is healthier: Naked Good Little Chipolatas or Chatar 280 g?
Overall, Naked Good Little Chipolatas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chatar 280 g has fewer calories: 240 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chatar 280 g has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.