Comparison

Musztarda miodowa vs Hellmans Honey & Mustard Dressing 250ml

Overall, Musztarda miodowa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMusztarda miodowaHellmans Honey & Mustard Dr...
Nutri-Score — c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 147 kcal 167 kcal
Fat 4.9 g 14 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1 g
Sugars 16.8 g 6.9 g
Salt — 1.1 g
Fiber 3.2 g —
Protein 5.1 g 0.9 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedEggs, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Musztarda miodowa has 12% fewer calories (147 kcal vs 167 kcal).
  • Musztarda miodowa has 65% less fat (4.9 g vs 14 g).
  • Musztarda miodowa has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Hellmans Honey & Mustard Dressing 250ml has 59% less sugar (6.9 g vs 16.8 g).
  • Musztarda miodowa has 82% more protein (5.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Only Hellmans Honey & Mustard Dressing 250ml lists: Eggs, Mustard.

Ingredients

Musztarda miodowa

Not available.

Hellmans Honey & Mustard Dressing 250ml

water, rapeseed oil, spirit vinegar, tarragon mustard (10%) (water, mustard seeds, spirit vinegar, sugar, salt, caramel syrup, natural spice flavouring), honey (8%), egg yolk, modified corn starch, natural mustard flavouring, salt, stabiliser (xanthan gum), caramelised sugar syrup, turmeric, preservative (potassium sorbate), colours (lemon, safflower), parsley, acidity regulator (citric acid),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Musztarda miodowa or Hellmans Honey & Mustard Dressing 250ml?

Overall, Musztarda miodowa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Musztarda miodowa has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Hellmans Honey & Mustard Dressing 250ml has less sugar: 6.9 g versus 16.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons