Comparison
Muscovado vs Rohrohr Zucker
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muscovado | Rohrohr Zucker |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 392 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 96 g | 97.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rohrohr Zucker has no fat, while Muscovado has 0.5 g.
- Muscovado has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Muscovado
Not available.
Rohrohr Zucker
Bio-Rohrohrzucker
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muscovado or Rohrohr Zucker?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rohrohr Zucker has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muscovado has less sugar: 96 g versus 97.4 g per 100 g.