Munster aop lc fe 200g vs Munster
Overall, Munster aop lc fe 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Munster aop lc fe 200g | Munster |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 334 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Munster aop lc fe 200g has 90% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Munster aop lc fe 200g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Munster aop lc fe 200g
Lait cru de vache, sel, ferments lactiques (dont lait) et d'affinage, présure.
Munster
_Lait_ pasteurisé de vache issu de l'aire géographique définie par l'AOP du Munster, sel, présure, ferments _lactiques_ et d'affinage.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Munster aop lc fe 200g or Munster?
Overall, Munster aop lc fe 200g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Munster aop lc fe 200g has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Munster aop lc fe 200g has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.