Munster vs Munster AOP
Overall, Munster AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Munster | Munster AOP |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 343 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Munster AOP has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Munster
_Lait_ pasteurisé de vache issu de l'aire géographique définie par l'AOP du Munster, sel, présure, ferments _lactiques_ et d'affinage.
Munster AOP
Lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactique (lait), ferments d'affinage, présure
FAQ
Which is healthier: Munster or Munster AOP?
Overall, Munster AOP has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Munster has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 343 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Munster AOP has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.