Munster 125 G Ermitage vs Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel
Overall, Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Munster 125 G Ermitage
Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Munster 125 G Ermitage | Petit Munster AOP au lait du... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has 11% less fat (24 g vs 27 g).
- Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has 11% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19 g).
- Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has 70% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Munster 125 G Ermitage
_Lait_ pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques et d'affinage, présure.
Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel
Lait biologique pasteurisé de vache, sel, présure animale, ferments (contient lait).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Munster 125 G Ermitage or Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel?
Overall, Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has fewer calories: 301 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petit Munster AOP au lait du parc naturel has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1 g per 100 g.