Munster 125 G Ermitage vs Petit Munster AOP Bio
Overall, Petit Munster AOP Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Munster 125 G Ermitage | Petit Munster AOP Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 330 kcal | 301 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petit Munster AOP Bio has 11% less fat (24 g vs 27 g).
- Petit Munster AOP Bio has 11% less saturated fat (17 g vs 19 g).
- Petit Munster AOP Bio has 70% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Munster 125 G Ermitage
_Lait_ pasteurisé, sel, ferments lactiques et d'affinage, présure.
Petit Munster AOP Bio
_lait_ biologique pasteurisé de vache, sel, présure animale, ferments lactiques (_lait_).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Munster 125 G Ermitage or Petit Munster AOP Bio?
Overall, Petit Munster AOP Bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Petit Munster AOP Bio has fewer calories: 301 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petit Munster AOP Bio has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1 g per 100 g.