Comparison

Multipack extra craquante vico vs Flame Grilled Steak Flavour Potato Crisps

Overall, Multipack extra craquante vico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMultipack extra craquante vi...Flame Grilled Steak Flavour...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 526 kcal 524 kcal
Fat 34 g 31 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0.6 g 2.3 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.5 g
Fiber 4.5 g 4 g
Protein 5.9 g 6.9 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Multipack extra craquante vico has 74% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Multipack extra craquante vico has 11% more fiber (4.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Flame Grilled Steak Flavour Potato Crisps has 14% more protein (6.9 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Multipack extra craquante vico is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Flame Grilled Steak Flavour Potato Crisps lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Multipack extra craquante vico

potato 65% (france), sunflower oil, salt

Flame Grilled Steak Flavour Potato Crisps

Potatoes, Sunflower Oil, Flame Grilled Steak Flavour (Lactose (_Milk_), Salt, Dried Onion, Dried Yeast Extract, Flavour Enhancers (Monosodium Glutamate, Disodium Guanylate), Potassium Chloride, Flavouring (contains _Milk_), Maltodextrin, Dried Skimmed _Milk_, Acid (Citric Acid), Colour (Paprika Extract)).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Multipack extra craquante vico or Flame Grilled Steak Flavour Potato Crisps?

Overall, Multipack extra craquante vico has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flame Grilled Steak Flavour Potato Crisps has fewer calories: 524 kcal versus 526 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Multipack extra craquante vico has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons