Moules de corde vs Moules de corde
Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules de corde | Moules de corde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 1.2 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moules de corde has 37% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Moules de corde has 60% less fat (1.2 g vs 3 g).
- Moules de corde has 60% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Moules de corde has no sugar, while Moules de corde has 0.5 g.
- Moules de corde has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Moules de corde
Not available.
Moules de corde
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules de corde or Moules de corde?
Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moules de corde has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moules de corde has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.