Comparison

Moules de Bouchot vs Moules de bouchot à la crème d’Isigny AOP et oignons

Overall, Moules de Bouchot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoules de BouchotMoules de bouchot à la crème...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 72 kcal 116 kcal
Fat 1.8 g 7.3 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 4.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 11.2 g 8.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk, Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Moules de Bouchot has 38% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 116 kcal).
  • Moules de Bouchot has 75% less fat (1.8 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Moules de Bouchot has 89% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Moules de Bouchot has no sugar, while Moules de bouchot à la crème d’Isigny AOP et oignons has 0.6 g.
  • Moules de Bouchot has 26% more protein (11.2 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Moules de Bouchot has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Moules de bouchot à la crème d’Isigny AOP et oignons lists: Gluten, Milk, Molluscs.

Ingredients

Moules de Bouchot

Not available.

Moules de bouchot à la crème d’Isigny AOP et oignons

_Moules_ de bouchot STG entières (Mytilus edulis)(_mollusque_) 80%, _crème_ fraîche d'Isigny AOP (_lait_) 5%, eau, oignon 3%, vin blanc, échalote, _beurre_ (_lait_), farine de _blé_ (_gluten_), persil, jus de citron, fibres végétales (lin, citron), ail, poivre blanc

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moules de Bouchot or Moules de bouchot à la crème d’Isigny AOP et oignons?

Overall, Moules de Bouchot has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Moules de Bouchot has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 116 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moules de Bouchot has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons