Comparison

Moulage chocolat lait vs Kinder Surprise

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoulage chocolat laitKinder Surprise
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 582 kcal 510 kcal
Fat 39 g 36.2 g
Saturated fat 24 g 24 g
Sugars 48 g 53.6 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber 2 g —
Protein 7.4 g 8.8 g
Additives01
AllergensMilkMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kinder Surprise has 12% fewer calories (510 kcal vs 582 kcal).
  • Moulage chocolat lait has 10% less sugar (48 g vs 53.6 g).
  • Kinder Surprise has 16% more protein (8.8 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Moulage chocolat lait is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Kinder Surprise lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Moulage chocolat lait

Sucre de canne*, beurre de cacao*, poudre de LAIT entier*, pâte de cacao*, extrait de vanille*. * Biologique. Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque, de soja et de céréales contenant du gluten. Cacao : 37% minimum. Elaboré à partir de lait origine UE. Le cacao provient de République Dominicaine et/ou Pérou et/ou Sierra Léone.

Kinder Surprise

Fine Milk Chocolate 45% (Sugar, Milk Powder, Cocoa Butter, Cocoa Mass, Emulsi Lecithins (Soya), Vanillin), Skimmed Milk Powder, Sugar, Vegetable Fats (Palm, Shea), Concentrated BUTTER, Emulsifier: Lecithins (Soya), Vanillin, Total Milk constituents: 32% - total Cocoa constituents: 14.5% Milk Chocolate contains Cocc Solids 32% min., Milk Solids 22.5% min

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moulage chocolat lait or Kinder Surprise?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kinder Surprise has fewer calories: 510 kcal versus 582 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moulage chocolat lait has less sugar: 48 g versus 53.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons