Comparison

Monster pacific punch vs Punch apfel

Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMonster pacific punchPunch apfel
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 46 kcal 395 kcal
Fat 0 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 11 g 75.5 g
Salt — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.2 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Monster pacific punch has 88% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 395 kcal).
  • Monster pacific punch has no fat, while Punch apfel has 1 g.
  • Monster pacific punch has 85% less sugar (11 g vs 75.5 g).

Ingredients

Monster pacific punch

Not available.

Punch apfel

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Monster pacific punch or Punch apfel?

Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Monster pacific punch has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Monster pacific punch has less sugar: 11 g versus 75.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons