Monster pacific punch vs Punch apfel
Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster pacific punch | Punch apfel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 46 kcal | 395 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 75.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster pacific punch has 88% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 395 kcal).
- Monster pacific punch has no fat, while Punch apfel has 1 g.
- Monster pacific punch has 85% less sugar (11 g vs 75.5 g).
Ingredients
Monster pacific punch
Not available.
Punch apfel
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster pacific punch or Punch apfel?
Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster pacific punch has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster pacific punch has less sugar: 11 g versus 75.5 g per 100 g.