Comparison

Le Punch Coco vs Monster pacific punch

Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientLe Punch CocoMonster pacific punch
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 117 kcal 46 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 0 g
Saturated fat 3 g 0 g
Sugars 20.8 g 11 g
Salt 0 g —
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 0.5 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Monster pacific punch has 61% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 117 kcal).
  • Monster pacific punch has no fat, while Le Punch Coco has 3.4 g.
  • Monster pacific punch has no saturated fat, while Le Punch Coco has 3 g.
  • Monster pacific punch has 47% less sugar (11 g vs 20.8 g).
  • Le Punch Coco has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Le Punch Coco lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Le Punch Coco

Alcool de canne, sirop de sucre, extrait de coco, lait, caramel 150A

Monster pacific punch

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Le Punch Coco or Monster pacific punch?

Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Monster pacific punch has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Monster pacific punch has less sugar: 11 g versus 20.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons