Le Punch Coco vs Monster pacific punch
Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Le Punch Coco | Monster pacific punch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 20.8 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster pacific punch has 61% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 117 kcal).
- Monster pacific punch has no fat, while Le Punch Coco has 3.4 g.
- Monster pacific punch has no saturated fat, while Le Punch Coco has 3 g.
- Monster pacific punch has 47% less sugar (11 g vs 20.8 g).
- Le Punch Coco has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Le Punch Coco lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Le Punch Coco
Alcool de canne, sirop de sucre, extrait de coco, lait, caramel 150A
Monster pacific punch
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Le Punch Coco or Monster pacific punch?
Overall, Monster pacific punch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster pacific punch has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster pacific punch has less sugar: 11 g versus 20.8 g per 100 g.