Comparison

Monster Energy Original vs TIGER Energy drink

Overall, TIGER Energy drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientMonster Energy OriginalTIGER Energy drink
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 47 kcal 21 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 11 g 4.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives76
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • TIGER Energy drink has 55% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 47 kcal).
  • TIGER Energy drink has 55% less sugar (4.9 g vs 11 g).
  • TIGER Energy drink has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Monster Energy Original

WASSER, ZUCKER, GLUKOSESIRUP, SÄUERUNGSMITTEL (CITRONENSÄURE), AROMEN, KOHLENSÄURE, TAURIN (0,4%), SÄUREREGULATOR (NATRIUMCITRATE), PANAX GINSENG WURZELEXTRAKT (0,08%), L-CARNITIN-L-TARTRAT (0,04%), KOFFEIN (0,03%), KONSERVIERUNGSSTOFFE (SORBINSÄURE, BENZOESÄURE), FARBSTOFF (ANTHOCYANE), VITAMINMISCHUNG (RIBOFLAVIN, NICOTINAMID, VITAMIN B6, VITAMIN B12), SALZ, GLUCURONOLACTON, GUARANASAMENEXTRAKT (0,002%), INOSIT, SÜßUNGSMITTEL (SUCRALOSE), MALTODEXTRIN.

TIGER Energy drink

water, sugar/glucose-fructose syrup, acidity regulators: citric acid and sodium citrates, carbon dioxide, taurine (0,4%), aroma, caffeine (0,03%), inositol, colours: e 101 and e 150d, sweetener – sucralose, vitamins: niacin, pantothenic acid, b6 and b12,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Monster Energy Original or TIGER Energy drink?

Overall, TIGER Energy drink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

TIGER Energy drink has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 47 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

TIGER Energy drink has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons