Misopaste hell vs Chili-Feuer
Overall, Chili-Feuer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Misopaste hell | Chili-Feuer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 159 kcal | 41 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 10.2 g | 11.5 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 11.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chili-Feuer has 74% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 159 kcal).
- Chili-Feuer has 61% less fat (2.2 g vs 5.6 g).
- Chili-Feuer has no saturated fat, while Misopaste hell has 1.1 g.
- Chili-Feuer has 92% less sugar (1 g vs 12.5 g).
- Misopaste hell has 11% less salt (10.2 g vs 11.5 g).
- Chili-Feuer has 34% more fiber (4.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Misopaste hell has 80% more protein (11.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Chili-Feuer has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Misopaste hell lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Misopaste hell
Wasser, 30% _Sojabohnen_, Reis, Salz.
Chili-Feuer
Gemahlene Chilipaprika (87%), Salz, Verdickungsmit lanthan; Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Konservierungstf Kaliumsorbat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Misopaste hell or Chili-Feuer?
Overall, Chili-Feuer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chili-Feuer has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili-Feuer has less sugar: 1 g versus 12.5 g per 100 g.