Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning vs Mirin
Overall, Mirin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mirin Style sweet cooking se... | Mirin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 40 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mirin has 29% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 333 kcal).
Ingredients
Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning
CORN SYRUP, GLUCOSE-FRUCTOSE, WATER, FERMENTED RICE SEASONING (WATER, RICE, CORN SYRUP, ALCOHOL, SALT, BREWING STARTER [ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE]), VINEGAR, SODIUM BENZOATE.
Mirin
Sirap (majs, potatis, sötpotatis), vatten, glukos-fruktossirap, krydda 0,9% (stärkelsesirap, ris, mältat ris, salt, alkohol), surhetsreglerande medel: E260; E262; E296; E330; E334; E338, socker.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning or Mirin?
Overall, Mirin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mirin has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning has less sugar: 40 g versus 40 g per 100 g.