Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning vs Mirin
Overall, Mirin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning
Mirin
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Mirin Style sweet cooking se... | Mirin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 333 kcal | 164 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 40 g | 18.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mirin has 51% fewer calories (164 kcal vs 333 kcal).
- Mirin has 53% less sugar (18.6 g vs 40 g).
- Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning has 95% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
Ingredients
Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning
CORN SYRUP, GLUCOSE-FRUCTOSE, WATER, FERMENTED RICE SEASONING (WATER, RICE, CORN SYRUP, ALCOHOL, SALT, BREWING STARTER [ASPERGILLUS ORYZAE]), VINEGAR, SODIUM BENZOATE.
Mirin
Fructose, Water, Glutinous Rice, Rice Koji, Salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mirin Style sweet cooking seasoning or Mirin?
Overall, Mirin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mirin has fewer calories: 164 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mirin has less sugar: 18.6 g versus 40 g per 100 g.