Comparison

Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies vs Viennese thins

Overall, Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilk Chocolate & Coconut coo...Viennese thins
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 508 kcal 533 kcal
Fat 28.5 g 30.1 g
Saturated fat 16.9 g 17.7 g
Sugars 25 g 32.8 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 5.8 g 5.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedGluten, Milk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies has 24% less sugar (25 g vs 32.8 g).
  • Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies has 12% more protein (5.8 g vs 5.1 g).
  • Only Viennese thins lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies

160 WOW TE DRINK BETTER. FEEL BETTER. FELIX Tussim HUSTENS

Viennese thins

Wheat Flour (_Wheat_ Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin). Butter (_Milk_) (27%), Milk Chocolate (25%) [Sugar. Cocoa Butter, Dried Whole _Milk_, Cocoa Mass. Whey Powder (_Milk_). Dried Skimmed _Milk_. Emulsifier (_Soya_ Lecithins)), Sugar, Cornflour. Salt. Flavouring _Milk_ Chocolate contains: Cocoa solids 25% minimum, Milk solids 14% minimum

FAQ

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies or Viennese thins?

Overall, Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies has fewer calories: 508 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Milk Chocolate & Coconut cookies has less sugar: 25 g versus 32.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons