Comparison

Milk Chocolate Almonds vs Feastables - Almond

Overall, Milk Chocolate Almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMilk Chocolate AlmondsFeastables - Almond
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 533 kcal 568 kcal
Fat 40 g 37 g
Saturated fat 13.3 g 19 g
Sugars 33.3 g 46 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 6.7 g 3.3 g
Protein 10 g 9.2 g
Additives30
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansMilk, Nuts, Soybeans, Mandeln, Milchschokolade, Vollmilchpulver

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Milk Chocolate Almonds has 30% less saturated fat (13.3 g vs 19 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Almonds has 28% less sugar (33.3 g vs 46 g).
  • Milk Chocolate Almonds has 51% more fiber (6.7 g vs 3.3 g).
  • Feastables - Almond is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Feastables - Almond lists: Mandeln, Milchschokolade, Vollmilchpulver.

Ingredients

Milk Chocolate Almonds

Milk Chocolate (Sugar, Cocoa Butter, Whole Milk, Chocolate Liquor, Nonfat Milk, Butter Oil, Soy Lecithin, Vanillin, Salt), Almonds (Almonds, Canola Oil), Corn Syrup, Dextrin, Maltodextrin, Confectioner's Glaze

Feastables - Almond

Milchschokolade (Zucker, Vollmilchpulver, Kakaobutter, Kakaomasse, Emulgator (Sojalecithine), Vanilleextrakt), Mandeln 12%. Kakao: 30 % mindestens. Milchtrockenmasse: 22 % mindestens. Kann Erdnüsse, andere Nüsse, Ei, Weizen und Gluten enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Milk Chocolate Almonds or Feastables - Almond?

Overall, Milk Chocolate Almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Milk Chocolate Almonds has fewer calories: 533 kcal versus 568 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Milk Chocolate Almonds has less sugar: 33.3 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons