Miel de tilleul de France vs Lindenhonig
Overall, Lindenhonig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miel de tilleul de France | Lindenhonig |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 326 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 79.8 g | 75 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miel de tilleul de France has no fat, while Lindenhonig has 0.5 g.
- Lindenhonig has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Miel de tilleul de France
Miel de tilleul
Lindenhonig
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miel de tilleul de France or Lindenhonig?
Overall, Lindenhonig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lindenhonig has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lindenhonig has less sugar: 75 g versus 79.8 g per 100 g.