Comparison
Lindenhonig vs Miele di tiglio
Overall, Lindenhonig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lindenhonig | Miele di tiglio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 302 kcal | 332 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 75 g | 82 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Miele di tiglio has no fat, while Lindenhonig has 0.5 g.
- Lindenhonig has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Lindenhonig
Not available.
Miele di tiglio
MIELE
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lindenhonig or Miele di tiglio?
Overall, Lindenhonig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lindenhonig has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 332 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lindenhonig has less sugar: 75 g versus 82 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Miel de tilleul de Franc... vs Lindenhonig
Miel de tilleul de Franc... vs Miele di tiglio
Miel de Tilleul Bio Fran... vs Lindenhonig
Miel de Tilleul Bio Fran... vs Miele di tiglio
Lindenhonig vs Bii Lindenhonig
Bii Lindenhonig vs Miele di tiglio
Miel de Tilleul du Valoi... vs Lindenhonig
Miel de Tilleul du Valoi... vs Miele di tiglio