Comparison

Miel de Forêt bio vs Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig

Overall, Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMiel de Forêt bioAromatischer Waldhonig flüss...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 2 —
Calories 326 kcal 282 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 79.8 g 70 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.6 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedWaldhonig

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has 13% fewer calories (282 kcal vs 326 kcal).
  • Miel de Forêt bio has no fat, while Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has 0.5 g.
  • Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has 12% less sugar (70 g vs 79.8 g).
  • Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig lists: Waldhonig.

Ingredients

Miel de Forêt bio

miel de forêt

Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig

_Waldhonig_ flüssig

FAQ

Which is healthier: Miel de Forêt bio or Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig?

Overall, Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has less sugar: 70 g versus 79.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons