Miel de Forêt bio vs Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig
Overall, Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Miel de Forêt bio
Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Miel de Forêt bio | Aromatischer Waldhonig flüss... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 326 kcal | 282 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 79.8 g | 70 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Waldhonig |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has 13% fewer calories (282 kcal vs 326 kcal).
- Miel de Forêt bio has no fat, while Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has 0.5 g.
- Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has 12% less sugar (70 g vs 79.8 g).
- Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig lists: Waldhonig.
Ingredients
Miel de Forêt bio
miel de forêt
Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig
_Waldhonig_ flüssig
FAQ
Which is healthier: Miel de Forêt bio or Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig?
Overall, Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has fewer calories: 282 kcal versus 326 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Aromatischer Waldhonig flüssig has less sugar: 70 g versus 79.8 g per 100 g.