Marcona almonds vs Amandes Marcona salées
Overall, Marcona almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Marcona almonds | Amandes Marcona salées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 643 kcal | 655 kcal |
| Fat | 50 g | 58 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 4.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Marcona almonds has 14% less fat (50 g vs 58 g).
- Amandes Marcona salées has 16% less saturated fat (4.5 g vs 5.4 g).
- Marcona almonds has no sugar, while Amandes Marcona salées has 4.1 g.
- Marcona almonds has 70% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- Amandes Marcona salées has 22% more protein (23 g vs 17.9 g).
- Marcona almonds has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Marcona almonds lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Marcona almonds
blanched marvin's almonds, peanut oil, sea salt
Amandes Marcona salées
amandes de la variété Marcona (origine Espagne), huile de tournesol, sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Marcona almonds or Amandes Marcona salées?
Overall, Marcona almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Marcona almonds has fewer calories: 643 kcal versus 655 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marcona almonds has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.