Comparison
Marcona almonds vs Amandes Marcona
Overall, Marcona almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Marcona almonds | Amandes Marcona |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 643 kcal | 610 kcal |
| Fat | 50 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 11 g |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Peanuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Amandes Marcona has 25% less saturated fat (4 g vs 5.4 g).
- Marcona almonds has no sugar, while Amandes Marcona has 4.8 g.
- Marcona almonds has 64% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
- Amandes Marcona has 15% more protein (21 g vs 17.9 g).
- Marcona almonds has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Marcona almonds lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Marcona almonds
blanched marvin's almonds, peanut oil, sea salt
Amandes Marcona
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Marcona almonds or Amandes Marcona?
Overall, Marcona almonds has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Amandes Marcona has fewer calories: 610 kcal versus 643 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Marcona almonds has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.