Maizitos Natural vs Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón
Overall, Maizitos Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Maizitos Natural
Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Maizitos Natural | Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Pap... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 628 kcal | 531 kcal |
| Fat | 60 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 59 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón has 15% fewer calories (531 kcal vs 628 kcal).
- Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón has 47% less fat (32 g vs 60 g).
- Maizitos Natural has 75% less saturated fat (3 g vs 12 g).
- Maizitos Natural has no sugar, while Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón has 3.8 g.
- Maizitos Natural has 93% less salt (0.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Maizitos Natural has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón has 97% more protein (59 g vs 2 g).
- Maizitos Natural has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Maizitos Natural
Maíz, aceite vegetal girasol, palma y o sus fracciones, antioxidante tocoferoles y sal.
Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Maizitos Natural or Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón?
Overall, Maizitos Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mezcla Andina Monte Rojo Papa Yuca Lima Limón has fewer calories: 531 kcal versus 628 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Maizitos Natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.