Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat vs Charlotte
Overall, Charlotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ma charlotte Vanille Chocola... | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 304 kcal | 90 kcal |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 27.3 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 4.7 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Charlotte has 70% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 304 kcal).
- Charlotte has no fat, while Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat has 16.7 g.
- Charlotte has no saturated fat, while Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat has 10.4 g.
- Charlotte has 96% less sugar (1 g vs 27.3 g).
- Charlotte has 45% more fiber (3.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat has 57% more protein (4.7 g vs 2 g).
- Charlotte has the better Nutri-Score.
- Charlotte is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat
_Crème_ fraîche (30% dans la mousse vanille et 40% dans la mousse au chocolat), sucre, chocolat (dont 20% de la mousse au chocolat: pâte et beurre de cacao, sucre, _beurre_ concentré, émulsifiant : lécithine de _soja_, arôme naturel de vanille), lait écrémé, eau, blanc et jaune d'_œuf_, farine de _blé_ (agent de traitement : acide ascorbique), poudre de cacao, fécule, poudre d'_amande_, sucre glace, sel, émulsifiants : esters lactiques des mono et diglycérides d’acides gras - mono et diglycérides d’acides gras, gélifiants : alginate de sodium - farine de graine de guar, gélatine de porc, extrait de vanille, arôme naturel (dont _lait_), arôme.
Charlotte
Pomme de terre fraîches, non épluchées.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ma charlotte Vanille Chocolat or Charlotte?
Overall, Charlotte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Charlotte has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 304 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Charlotte has less sugar: 1 g versus 27.3 g per 100 g.