Comparison

Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 vs Gnocchi à poêler

Overall, Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poe...Gnocchi à poêler
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 197 kcal 199 kcal
Fat 3.1 g 3.9 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 0.5 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.3 g
Fiber 2.2 g 0 g
Protein 5.3 g 5.6 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 has 21% less fat (3.1 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Gnocchi à poêler has 77% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 has 100% more fiber (2.2 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3

Purée (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, épice : curcuma), semoule de BLE, farine de BLE, huile de colza, sel. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œufs, soja, moutarde et gluten provenant d'autres céréales. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.

Gnocchi à poêler

Eau, semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure, flocons de pommes de (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, extrait d'épices), huile de tournesol, sel. Peut contenir des traces d'œuf, lait, soja, sésame et fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 or Gnocchi à poêler?

Overall, Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 199 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gnocchi à poêler has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons