Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 vs Gnocchis à Poêler
Overall, Gnocchis à Poêler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3
Gnocchis à Poêler
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poe... | Gnocchis à Poêler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gnocchis à Poêler has 13% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.1 g).
- Gnocchis à Poêler has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Gnocchis à Poêler has 15% more fiber (2.6 g vs 2.2 g).
Ingredients
Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3
Purée (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, épice : curcuma), semoule de BLE, farine de BLE, huile de colza, sel. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œufs, soja, moutarde et gluten provenant d'autres céréales. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.
Gnocchis à Poêler
Purée (eau, pommes de terre déshydratées, épice : curcuma), semoule de BLE, huile de colza et/ou tournesol, sel, farine de BLE. Peut contenir des traces de lait, œufs, soja et moutarde. Conditionné sous atmosphère protectrice.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lustucru lot 2 gnocchi a poeler roll 500g 2e a -68% x3 or Gnocchis à Poêler?
Overall, Gnocchis à Poêler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gnocchis à Poêler has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 197 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gnocchis à Poêler has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.