Comparison

Lunettes à la myrtille vs Lunettes de Romans myrtille BIO

Overall, Lunettes à la myrtille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLunettes à la myrtilleLunettes de Romans myrtille...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 439 kcal 458 kcal
Fat 15 g 17 g
Saturated fat 7.2 g 7.7 g
Sugars 32 g 35 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 2.1 g 2.2 g
Protein 5.7 g 6.2 g
Additives44
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lunettes à la myrtille has 12% less fat (15 g vs 17 g).

Ingredients

Lunettes à la myrtille

Farine de blé* 48,5% (origine France), sucre de canne*, beurre concentré* œufs, sirop de glucose purée de myrtille* 5%, huile de tournesol, son de blé*, arôme naturel de myrtille, sucre glace, acidifiant: acide citrique, gélifiant: pectines de fruits, correcteur d'acidité: citrates de sodium, poudre a lever: carbonates de sodium. *Bio.

Lunettes de Romans myrtille BIO

Farine de BLÉ* 48% (origine France), sucre de canne*, beurre concentré* (LAIT), ŒUFS*, sirop de glucose*, purée de myrtille* 5%, huile de tournesol*, son de BLÉ*, arôme naturel de myrtille, acidifiant : acide citrique, gélifiant : pectines de fruits, correcteur d'acidité : citrates de sodium, poudre à lever : carbonates de sodium. * Biologique. Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque et de soja.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lunettes à la myrtille or Lunettes de Romans myrtille BIO?

Overall, Lunettes à la myrtille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lunettes à la myrtille has fewer calories: 439 kcal versus 458 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lunettes à la myrtille has less sugar: 32 g versus 35 g per 100 g.

More comparisons