Comparison

LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g vs Crêpes Bretonnes nature x10 - 300g

Overall, LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLS Petites crêpes nature bio...Crêpes Bretonnes nature x10...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 265 kcal 382 kcal
Fat 9.1 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 8.4 g
Sugars 17 g 27 g
Salt 0.3 g 1.7 g
Fiber 1.4 g 1.6 g
Protein 7.1 g 7.4 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has 31% fewer calories (265 kcal vs 382 kcal).
  • LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has 30% less fat (9.1 g vs 13 g).
  • LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has 73% less saturated fat (2.3 g vs 8.4 g).
  • LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has 37% less sugar (17 g vs 27 g).
  • LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has 85% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g

Lait entier frais", farine de froment, œufs entiers, sucre de canne 14%, huile de tournesol", sel de Guérande.

Crêpes Bretonnes nature x10 - 300g

Farine de BLÉ 32%, LAIT frais pasteurisé 26%, sucre, OEUFS entiers pasteurisés* 13%, BEURRE frais 9%, sel. *OEUFS de poules élevées en plein air.

FAQ

Which is healthier: LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g or Crêpes Bretonnes nature x10 - 300g?

Overall, LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has fewer calories: 265 kcal versus 382 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

LS Petites crêpes nature bio 240g has less sugar: 17 g versus 27 g per 100 g.

More comparisons