Comparison

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks vs Pepper Jack Cheese Sticks

Overall, Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLow-Moisture Part-Skim Mozza...Pepper Jack Cheese Sticks
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 286 kcal 381 kcal
Fat 21.4 g 28.6 g
Saturated fat 12.5 g 19 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 25 g 23.8 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has 25% fewer calories (286 kcal vs 381 kcal).
  • Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has 25% less fat (21.4 g vs 28.6 g).
  • Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has 34% less saturated fat (12.5 g vs 19 g).

Ingredients

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks

Cultured Organic, Pasteurized Part-Skim Milk, Salt,, Microbial Enzymes.

Pepper Jack Cheese Sticks

CULTURED PASTEURIZED MILK, RED AND GREEN JALAPENO PEPPERS, SALT,, ENZYMES

FAQ

Which is healthier: Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks or Pepper Jack Cheese Sticks?

Overall, Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has fewer calories: 286 kcal versus 381 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Low-Moisture Part-Skim Mozzarella Cheese Sticks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons