Comparison

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% vs Sorensens

Overall, Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLooping Halbfettmargarine 39...Sorensens
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group 4 2
Calories 376 kcal 589 kcal
Fat 39.4 g 65 g
Saturated fat 12.1 g 35 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.5 g —
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.2 g 0.6 g
Additives50
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 36% fewer calories (376 kcal vs 589 kcal).
  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 39% less fat (39.4 g vs 65 g).
  • Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has 65% less saturated fat (12.1 g vs 35 g).
  • Sorensens has 67% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Sorensens is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39%

Halbfettmargarine 39% Zutaten : Wasser, pflanzliche Öle und Fette (Raps Palm, in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), modifziete Stärke, Emulgator (E471, Magermilchpulver, Salz (0,5 %) Konservierungsstoff (E202), Aroma, Säuerungsmittel (Zitronensäure, Milchsäure ), Farbstoff (Carotine), Vitamine (Vitamin D), Gesamtfettgehalt : 39 %,

Sorensens

Mischstreichtett aus butter und rapsöl, Fet gesamtfett, Milchfet', Pflanzenfett, Wasser, Rapsöl, Magermilchjoghurt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% or Sorensens?

Overall, Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has fewer calories: 376 kcal versus 589 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Looping Halbfettmargarine 39% has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons