Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé) vs Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl
Overall, Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé)
Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (fi... | Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.4 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl has 44% less sugar (3 g vs 5.4 g).
Ingredients
Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé)
Eau de source St Benoit (95%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, extraits de thé(1) (0.12%), jus de pêche à base de concentré (0.1%), arôme naturel de pêche avec autres arômes naturels, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.(1) Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Pour en savoir plus : ra.org
Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl
Eau de source St Benoit (96%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, extraits de thé (1) (0.12 %), arôme naturel, jus de pêche à base de concentré (0,1%), arôme naturel de pêche avec autres arômes naturels, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.(1) Certifié Rainforest Alliance - Pour en savoir plus : ra.org
FAQ
Which is healthier: Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé) or Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl?
Overall, Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé) has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Look Thé Pêche PET 20cl has less sugar: 3 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.