Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé) vs Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L
Overall, Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé)
Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (fi... | Look Thé citron - citron ver... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 26 kcal | 19 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.4 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has 26% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 26 kcal).
- Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has 11% less sugar (4.8 g vs 5.4 g).
- Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé)
Eau de source St Benoit (95%), sucre, acidifiant : acide citrique, extraits de thé(1) (0.12%), jus de pêche à base de concentré (0.1%), arôme naturel de pêche avec autres arômes naturels, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.(1) Certifié Rainforest Alliance. Pour en savoir plus : ra.org
Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Look Thé pêche bk 6x20cl (film imprimé) or Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L?
Overall, Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 26 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Look Thé citron - citron vert PET 1,5L has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.4 g per 100 g.