Comparison

L'onctueux et lit de framboise vs High protein Myrtille

Overall, High protein Myrtille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientL'onctueux et lit de framboi...High protein Myrtille
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 164 kcal 55 kcal
Fat 10 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 7 g 0.1 g
Sugars 15 g 2.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.6 g —
Protein 2.4 g 9.2 g
Additives33
AllergensMilk, NutsMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • High protein Myrtille has 66% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 164 kcal).
  • High protein Myrtille has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 10 g).
  • High protein Myrtille has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 7 g).
  • High protein Myrtille has 81% less sugar (2.8 g vs 15 g).
  • High protein Myrtille has 74% more protein (9.2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • High protein Myrtille has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only L'onctueux et lit de framboise lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

L'onctueux et lit de framboise

73% crème fermentée (_lait_), 14% framboises, 10,8% sucre, amidon modifié de maïs, eau, denrées alimentaires à propriétés colorante : concentré de carotte, concentré de betterave rouge ; épaississant : pectines ; correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique.

High protein Myrtille

Lait écrémé, myrtilles 5%, amidon de maïs, arômes naturels, épaississant: pectines, édulcorants : sucralose et acésulfame K, ferments lactiques, vitamine D.

FAQ

Which is healthier: L'onctueux et lit de framboise or High protein Myrtille?

Overall, High protein Myrtille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

High protein Myrtille has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 164 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

High protein Myrtille has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons