Lipodrene vs Halls
Overall, Lipodrene has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lipodrene | Halls |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 387 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 77 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 8 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lipodrene has no calories, while Halls has 387 kcal.
- Lipodrene has no sugar, while Halls has 77 g.
Ingredients
Lipodrene
Dextrose, Microcrystalline Cellulose, Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose, Stearic Acid, Magnesium Stearate, Sodium Starch Glycolate, Starch, Triacetin, Titanium Dioxide, FD&C Yellow #5 Lake, Silica, FD&C Yellow #6 Lake Dosage: Take 1-2 tablets in the morning and 1 tablet after lunch. Do not exceed 4 tablets daily. Hi-Tech Pharm 1024
Halls
Sugar, glucose syrup, flavourings, acids (lactic acid, citric acid), acidity regulators (E325, E332).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lipodrene or Halls?
Overall, Lipodrene has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lipodrene has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lipodrene has less sugar: 0 g versus 77 g per 100 g.