Comparison

Les Crozets aux Noix du Dauphiné vs Pates crozets au Sarrasin

Overall, Pates crozets au Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLes Crozets aux Noix du Daup...Pates crozets au Sarrasin
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 375 kcal 367 kcal
Fat 4 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 1 g
Sugars 2.5 g 3 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.3 g
Fiber 3.5 g 4 g
Protein 13 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensEggs, Gluten, NutsEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pates crozets au Sarrasin has 25% less fat (3 g vs 4 g).
  • Les Crozets aux Noix du Dauphiné has 17% less sugar (2.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Pates crozets au Sarrasin has 64% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Pates crozets au Sarrasin has 13% more fiber (4 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Pates crozets au Sarrasin has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pates crozets au Sarrasin is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Les Crozets aux Noix du Dauphiné lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Les Crozets aux Noix du Dauphiné

Semoule de _blé_ dur de qualité supérieure issu de la Filière Alpina Savoie, farine de _blé_ tendre des pays de Savoie, _œufs_ frais des pays de Savoie 10%, _noix_ du Dauphiné 3,5%, arôme naturel de _noix_,

Pates crozets au Sarrasin

Semoule de blé dur de qualité supérieure 68 %, farine de sarrasin 17 %, œufs frais 15% (soit 176 g par kilo de farine et de semoule), sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Les Crozets aux Noix du Dauphiné or Pates crozets au Sarrasin?

Overall, Pates crozets au Sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pates crozets au Sarrasin has fewer calories: 367 kcal versus 375 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Les Crozets aux Noix du Dauphiné has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons