Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge vs La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015
Overall, Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge
La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bor... | La petite chapelle de Bordea... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has 90% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has no fat, while La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015 has 11 g.
- Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has no saturated fat, while La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015 has 4 g.
- Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has 38% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Only Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge
Vin rouge. Contient des _sulfites_.
La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge or La petite chapelle de Bordeaux 2015?
Overall, Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Leo De La Gaffeliere Aoc Bordeaux Rouge has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.