LAY'S MAX Naturel vs LAY'S MAX Paprika
Overall, LAY'S MAX Naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | LAY'S MAX Naturel | LAY'S MAX Paprika |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 524 kcal | 519 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 4.7 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- LAY'S MAX Paprika has 15% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 3.3 g).
- LAY'S MAX Naturel has 75% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2 g).
- LAY'S MAX Naturel has 32% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- LAY'S MAX Naturel has 13% more protein (6.7 g vs 5.8 g).
- LAY'S MAX Naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
LAY'S MAX Naturel
Aardappelen, plantaardige olien (zonnebloemkoolzaadin wisselende hoeveelheden), zout, antioxidanten (rozemarijnextract, cor, inezuur, tocoferolrijk extract, citroenzuur),
LAY'S MAX Paprika
aardappelen, plantaardige oliën (zonnebloem, koolzaad, in wisselende hoeveelheden), paprikasmaak [suiker, zout, paprikapoeder, gerookte zoete paprikapoeder, uienpoeder, knoflookpoeder, aroma's, kleurstof (paprika-extract), fructose, cayennepeper, voedingszuur (citroenzuur)], antioxidanten (rozemarijnextract, ascorbinezuur, tocoferolrijk extract, citroenzuur)
FAQ
Which is healthier: LAY'S MAX Naturel or LAY'S MAX Paprika?
Overall, LAY'S MAX Naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
LAY'S MAX Paprika has fewer calories: 519 kcal versus 524 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
LAY'S MAX Naturel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.