Lapin Or Caramel Salé vs Milky Caramel Osterhase
Overall, Milky Caramel Osterhase has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lapin Or Caramel Salé | Milky Caramel Osterhase |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 549 kcal | 565 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 34.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 22.2 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 55.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Milky Caramel Osterhase has no salt, while Lapin Or Caramel Salé has 0.7 g.
- Milky Caramel Osterhase has 19% more protein (7.7 g vs 6.2 g).
- Only Lapin Or Caramel Salé lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Lapin Or Caramel Salé
Sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de LAIT, pâte de cacao, LACTOSE, sirop de glucose, poudre de LAIT écrémé, sel, lécithine de SOJA, extrait de malt d'ORGE, arôme.
Milky Caramel Osterhase
8, 2025/ L332E06 ML 11 Kinder Nitrwerte Energie 03/kcal) Je 100g 2359/565 Fell (@) 34,3 davon gesätti te Fettsäuren (g) 22.2 Kohlenhydrat (9) 56,0 won Zucker (g) 559 welt (g) 7,7 San டி 0.386 110ge Ferrero, DE-60624 Frankfurt am Main (EU). DE +49 696656660 Ferrero Osterreich, Sterzinger Str. 1, AT-6020 Innsbruck (EU). 區 Kind UBERRA SPIELE LERNEN C SPASS HABE Kinder Harry Hase Mädchen 309 100 g 4.12
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lapin Or Caramel Salé or Milky Caramel Osterhase?
Overall, Milky Caramel Osterhase has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lapin Or Caramel Salé has fewer calories: 549 kcal versus 565 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lapin Or Caramel Salé has less sugar: 52 g versus 55.9 g per 100 g.