Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch vs Milky Caramel Osterhase
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch | Milky Caramel Osterhase |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 564 kcal | 565 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 34.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 22.2 g |
| Sugars | 50 g | 55.9 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch has 11% less sugar (50 g vs 55.9 g).
- Milky Caramel Osterhase has no salt, while Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch has 0.3 g.
- Only Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch lists: Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch
Zucker, Kakaobutter, Vollmilchpulver, Kakaomasse, Milchzucker, Magermilchpulver, Emulgator (Sojalecithin), Gerstenmalzextrakt, Aroma. Kann Haselnüsse, Mandeln und andere Schalenfrüchte enthalten. Kakao: 30%
Milky Caramel Osterhase
8, 2025/ L332E06 ML 11 Kinder Nitrwerte Energie 03/kcal) Je 100g 2359/565 Fell (@) 34,3 davon gesätti te Fettsäuren (g) 22.2 Kohlenhydrat (9) 56,0 won Zucker (g) 559 welt (g) 7,7 San டி 0.386 110ge Ferrero, DE-60624 Frankfurt am Main (EU). DE +49 696656660 Ferrero Osterreich, Sterzinger Str. 1, AT-6020 Innsbruck (EU). 區 Kind UBERRA SPIELE LERNEN C SPASS HABE Kinder Harry Hase Mädchen 309 100 g 4.12
FAQ
Which is healthier: Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch or Milky Caramel Osterhase?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch has fewer calories: 564 kcal versus 565 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Goldhase Tafel Vollmilch has less sugar: 50 g versus 55.9 g per 100 g.