Lapin à la moutarde vs 1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff
Overall, Lapin à la moutarde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lapin à la moutarde | 1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 203 kcal |
| Fat | 7.3 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 8.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lapin à la moutarde has 27% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 203 kcal).
- Lapin à la moutarde has 44% less fat (7.3 g vs 13 g).
- Lapin à la moutarde has 78% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 8.1 g).
- 1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff has 82% less sugar (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
- 1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff has 60% less salt (0.6 g vs 1.4 g).
- Lapin à la moutarde has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only 1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Lapin à la moutarde
Not available.
1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff
"Viande de lapin, poitrine fumée (23%) [poitrine de porc (origine : France), sel, conservateurs : lactate de potassium, nitrite de sodium, dextrose, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium], _EMMENTAL_ (15%) [ _LAIT_ de vache pasteurisé (origine : France), sel, ferments lactiques, coagulant] Viande de lapin issue d'animaux nourris sans OGM (<0,9%) "
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lapin à la moutarde or 1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff?
Overall, Lapin à la moutarde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lapin à la moutarde has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 203 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
1 Rôti de lapin façon Orloff has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.