Comparison

Langue de bœuf sauce piquante vs Langue de bœuf sauce madère

Overall, Langue de bœuf sauce madère has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLangue de bœuf sauce piquant...Langue de bœuf sauce madère
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 136 kcal 111 kcal
Fat 9.2 g 5.8 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 2.1 g
Sugars 0.8 g 1.3 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.8 g
Protein 11 g 5.4 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Langue de bœuf sauce madère has 18% fewer calories (111 kcal vs 136 kcal).
  • Langue de bœuf sauce madère has 37% less fat (5.8 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Langue de bœuf sauce madère has 50% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has 38% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Langue de bœuf sauce madère has 31% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has 51% more protein (11 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Only Langue de bœuf sauce piquante lists: Gluten, Mustard.

Ingredients

Langue de bœuf sauce piquante

Langue de bœuf (45%) (Origine France et non-UE) Sauce (55%) : eau filtrée, vin blanc, cornichons, vinaigre, farine de _blé_, saindoux, oignons, sel de Guérande (1.6%), farine de _moutarde_, épices (paprika, curry), arômes naturels (dont moutarde), estragon, persil. Pourcentages exprimés sur la sauce.

Langue de bœuf sauce madère

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Langue de bœuf sauce piquante or Langue de bœuf sauce madère?

Overall, Langue de bœuf sauce madère has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Langue de bœuf sauce madère has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Langue de bœuf sauce piquante has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons