Comparison

Lamelles de kebab vs Madomel Lamelles de Kebab

Overall, Lamelles de kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLamelles de kebabMadomel Lamelles de Kebab
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 109 kcal 153 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 8.4 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 2.9 g
Sugars 2.2 g 0.6 g
Salt 2 g 3 g
Protein 18.1 g 18 g
Additives70
AllergensCelery, Milk, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lamelles de kebab has 29% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 153 kcal).
  • Lamelles de kebab has 73% less fat (2.3 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Lamelles de kebab has 79% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Madomel Lamelles de Kebab has 73% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Lamelles de kebab has 33% less salt (2 g vs 3 g).
  • Lamelles de kebab has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Lamelles de kebab lists: Celery, Milk, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Lamelles de kebab

82% viande de poulet (cuisse et filet), eau, amidon modifié, sel, lactose (lait), dextrose, stabilisants: E452+ E451+ E450, protéines de lait, acidifiant: E331, sucre, épices (sulfites), exhausteur de goût : E621, plantes aromatiques (sulfites), poivrons déshydratés, antioxydant: E316, arômes naturels et autres arômes (soja et celeri), protéines de soja, gélifiant: E407, antioxydant E301

Madomel Lamelles de Kebab

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lamelles de kebab or Madomel Lamelles de Kebab?

Overall, Lamelles de kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lamelles de kebab has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Madomel Lamelles de Kebab has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons