Lamelles de kebab vs Lamelles de kebab
Overall, Lamelles de kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lamelles de kebab | Lamelles de kebab |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 162 kcal | 235 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lamelles de kebab has 31% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 235 kcal).
- Lamelles de kebab has 36% less fat (9 g vs 14 g).
- Lamelles de kebab has 30% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 4.6 g).
- Lamelles de kebab has 72% less sugar (1.9 g vs 6.7 g).
- Lamelles de kebab has 28% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Lamelles de kebab has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
- Lamelles de kebab has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Lamelles de kebab
Not available.
Lamelles de kebab
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lamelles de kebab or Lamelles de kebab?
Overall, Lamelles de kebab has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lamelles de kebab has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lamelles de kebab has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.