Lait Ribot vs 3512690006165
Overall, 3512690006165 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Lait Ribot | 3512690006165 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 4 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 3512690006165 has 43% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 67 kcal).
- 3512690006165 has 78% less fat (0.9 g vs 4 g).
- 3512690006165 has 78% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.7 g).
- 3512690006165 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Lait Ribot lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Lait Ribot
Lait frais entier pasteurisé origine Bretagne, Ferments lactiques.
3512690006165
inte AIT Isla Délice HALAL Lait fermenté ature لبن VOLUME IL Karnemelk Lait battu Isla POUR VOUS LAIT LAIT ORIGINE FRANCE COLLECTE A 50 KM DE LA LAITERIE **Suggestion de présentation *BE/NL Coop Celal Isto Dillio produ Le la accompa Dep
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lait Ribot or 3512690006165?
Overall, 3512690006165 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
3512690006165 has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lait Ribot has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 4 g per 100 g.