Lait caramel beurre salé vs Milk chocolate caramel seasalt
Overall, Lait caramel beurre salé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Lait caramel beurre salé
Milk chocolate caramel seasalt
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lait caramel beurre salé | Milk chocolate caramel seasa... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 547 kcal | 547 kcal |
| Fat | 32 g | 33.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 20.5 g |
| Sugars | 54 g | 52.8 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lait caramel beurre salé has 46% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Only Milk chocolate caramel seasalt lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Lait caramel beurre salé
Sucre de canne, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait entier, pâte de cacao (Pérou, Équateur), éclats de caramel au beurre salé 10% (sucre, sirop de glucose, beurre, crème, eau, sel de Guérande), poudre de lait écrémé, émulsifiant: lécithine de tournesol, fleur de sel de Guérande.
Milk chocolate caramel seasalt
sugar, 23% whole milk powder, cocoa butter, 10% almonds with caramel (sugar, concentrated butter, glucose syrup, butter, 5% almonds, lactose, sea salt, emulsifier: lecithins [sunflower], natural vanilla flavoring), cocoa paste, 0,5% sea salt, emulsifier: lecithins (sunflower),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lait caramel beurre salé or Milk chocolate caramel seasalt?
Overall, Lait caramel beurre salé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lait caramel beurre salé has fewer calories: 547 kcal versus 547 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Milk chocolate caramel seasalt has less sugar: 52.8 g versus 54 g per 100 g.