Comparison
Lagerbier Hell vs Münchner Hell
Overall, Münchner Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Lagerbier Hell | Münchner Hell |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 38 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Münchner Hell has no fat, while Lagerbier Hell has 0.5 g.
- Münchner Hell has no sugar, while Lagerbier Hell has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Lagerbier Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfenextrakt
Münchner Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lagerbier Hell or Münchner Hell?
Overall, Münchner Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Münchner Hell has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Münchner Hell has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.