Comparison
Münchner Hell vs Franziskaner Premium Weissbier Naturtrüb
Overall, Münchner Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Better choice
Münchner Hell
Paulaner · 0,5 l
Franziskaner Premium Weissbier Naturtrüb
Franziskaner · 0,5 l
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Münchner Hell | Franziskaner Premium Weissbi... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 43 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Münchner Hell has 12% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 43 kcal).
Ingredients
Münchner Hell
Wasser, Gerstenmalz, Hopfen
Franziskaner Premium Weissbier Naturtrüb
Wasser, Weizenmalz, Gerstenmalz, Hopfenextrakt,Hefe.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Münchner Hell or Franziskaner Premium Weissbier Naturtrüb?
Overall, Münchner Hell has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Münchner Hell has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 43 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Münchner Hell has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Münchner Hell vs Büble Bier Edelbräu
Münchner Hell vs Hefe-Weißbier naturtrüb
Franziskaner Premium Wei... vs Lagerbier Hell
Münchner Hell vs Lagerbier Hell
Münchner Hell vs Augustiner Lagerbier Hel...
Franziskaner Premium Wei... vs Oktoberfestbier
Münchner Hell vs Oktoberfestbier
Franziskaner Premium Wei... vs Büble Bier Edelbräu