Comparison
Kronenbourg,1664 vs Sagres mini
Overall, Sagres mini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kronenbourg,1664 | Sagres mini |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 39 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sagres mini has 13% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Kronenbourg,1664 has 60% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.2 g).
- Sagres mini is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kronenbourg,1664 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kronenbourg,1664
Eau, MALT D'ORGE, BLE, sirop de glucose, extrait de houblon, SULFITES
Sagres mini
Água, Malte de _CEVADA_, Milho, _CEVADA_, Extrato de Lúpulo.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kronenbourg,1664 or Sagres mini?
Overall, Sagres mini has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sagres mini has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kronenbourg,1664 has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.